DATA (Cases, Counts, Deaths, etc.)

Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64



COVID charts quiz

Hospitalizations are almost HALF mild or NO symptoms

Only 6% of covid deaths are actually just covid deaths: Link 1 and Link 2

AP news virus cases include those probably without tests

Double counting COVID infections

UK officials do double counting COVID infections numbers, because a nasal swab and a saliva swab around counted as two people, when both tests come from the same person.

NY Funeral directors pressured into false COVID counts

Funeral directors in NY come out to testify that they’re being pressured to toe tag everyone as COVID19 when the cause of death wasn’t COVID19.

Houston medical tent was never used

Houston set to demolish a $17 million temporary medical tent for COVID victims…because it didn’t even see one patient.

Shotgun death = COVID death

State Department of Health in Washington admit to adding people who died of shotgun wounds to the COVID dead count. 

Inflated death counts

At Tuesday’s White House coronavirus press conference, task force member Dr. Deborah Birx said that while some countries are reporting coronavirus fatality numbers differently, in the U.S. you are counted as a victim of the pandemic if you die while testing positive for the virus, even if something else causes your death.”

Canadian nurse testifies that CV-19 death and infection numbers are being faked

Diagnosing ANY death as caused by Covid-19

99% of cases are mild (Worldometer)

Out of the current active cases worldwide, 99% are mild. Only 1% are serious or critical. Out of closed cases (recovered, discharged from hospitals, or died), 93% recovered or discharged.

The Curve is Already Flat

Tracy Beanz, April 6, 2020

If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?

Haly, et. al, July 24, 2020

CDC PAGE: COVID-19 Pandemic Planning Scenarios

A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data

John P.A. Ioannidis, March 17, 2020

COVID-19: Making Sense of the Numbers: Varying Mortality Rates Paint an Intriguing Picture

by Robert Bartholomew Ph.D., posted March 24, 2020

COVID-19 – Evidence Over Hysteria

by Tyler Durden, Mar 21, 2020

In March, US Deaths from COVID-19 Totaled Less Than 2 Percent of All Deaths

by Ryan McMaken, 04/06/2020

Flawed Models Show Why COVID-19 Policies Must Consider Total Mortality

James Enstrom, April 23, 2020

Coronavirus can be deadly, but flu and pneumonia have killed over 1,000 in NJ this season

Scott Fallon, March 5, 2020

CDC: 80,000 people died of flu last winter [2017] in U.S., highest death toll in 40 years

A not-too-well-known epidemic. Associated Press, Sept. 26, 2018

FRAUD (and What Could Be Behind It)

COVID-19 Umbrella Term to Operate a Fake Pandemic: Not 1 Disease, Not 1 Cause

Plandemic (Documentary)

A Warrior Calls

Huge resource page with common law explanations and 12 pages of COVID deceptions

Why the “virus” pandemic is a FARCE

Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman interview on Mike Adams

9 COVID Facts: A Pandemic of Fearmongering and Ignorance


American Frontline doctors address misinformation on Covid


NYC Nurse: fake tests and killing by ventilator

Perspectives  on the Pandemic | The (Undercover) Epicenter Nurse | Episode Nine

NY city Nurse comes forward with documents proving that covid positive tests were faked and fabricated… and it gets worse. This nurse and many other nurses talking about the medical system using ventilators to actually kill the patients.

Fake testing station

In this video we see a COVID testing station completely faked because no real person was interested in taking the test, because no one is sick and they also don’t trust the medical or government system at this point in time. Faked by CBS news to mind control the public.

Italian Parliament member: pandemic removes human rights, vaccine is poison

And yet another member of Italian Parliament [Sara Cunial] takes the house floor to explain that not  only is the pandemic fake, it’s being used as a back drop to remove human rights and poison people with a new untested vaccine.

Austrian Minister of Health lies about COVID-19

Austrian member of Parliament [Kickl] unloads on the Minister of Health for lying to the Austrian public about COVID-19 and plunging the country in to complete disaster…based on weaponized fear, fibs and fabrications.

Washington Post: COVID-19 greatest hoax ever

Washington Post reports that COVID-19 the greatest hoax ever perpetrated upon the American public in history by media and government.

UK: Government lying about COVID numbers

Reporter in the UK [Paul Weston] points out more government lying about COVID death numbers. 

Dolores Cahill: Media not telling the truth

Prof. Dolores Cahill, PhD in Immunology and one of the world’s most well-respected research scientists, explains that the media is not telling the truth about COVID19.

Question the media

Respiratory expert at US hospital explains that nothing is adding up and that the media reports should be questioned.

Lies Damned Lies and Coronavirus statistics

NY State admits adding thousands to CV-19 death counts with no testing

New York Times article

Numbers faked by US government

Medical doctor in Montana explains that CV-19 death and infection numbers are being faked by US government.

All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No Plague and a signature of mass homicide by government response


The infectious myth

A researched paper with almost 100 references/sources

Gov’t telling doctors/hospitals to lie about numbers Link 1 and Link 2

US medical doctor and state senator explains that the US government has sent official documentation telling doctors and hospitals to lie about CV-19 death and infection numbers.

US government actually admits that every death counted as a COVID-19 death is either a) presumed to be caused by COVID-19 or b) was caused by another disease . . . and  also counted as a COVID-19 death.

LA Schools “Daily Pass”


The New Normal (documentary)

Dr. Scarlett Yan on the CCP

She’s so passionate!

German Official Leaks Report Denouncing Corona as ‘A Global False Alarm’

by Daniele Pozzati, June 1, 2020

Dr. Michael McDowell – Explains the True Agenda Behind the Creation of COVID-19 [A MUST-LISTEN]

Aug 31, 2021

We Are Being Played

Simple summary of Agenda 2030, etc.

Total Reset Brave New World Ultimate Revolution

Rick Friedrich

The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?

BOOK by Michael Sandel

James Woods, June 3, 2020


“Democrats were literally arresting Americans for opening their businesses, but now are silent as protesters burn them down. You were fined for worshipping in your church, but now cheered for marching in screaming crowds.”

Governments Admit COVID-19 a Cover for Depopulation Program

Alex Jones, Feb 13, 2021

Why this Draconian Response to COVID-19?

Jeffrey A. Tucker, March 8, 2020

Coronavirus Lockdown And What You Are Not Being Told – Part 1

Posted By: Iain, April 9, 2020

Fake Coronavirus Data, Fear Campaign. Spread of the COVID-19 Infection

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, August 02, 2020

Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 Was Planned to Usher in the New World Order

Posted on October 1, 2020 by State of the Nation


President Eisenhower’s farewell address to the nation

In that speech, he warned against the “military-industrial complex,” but his warning did not end there. He also advised that we must be wary that “public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite,” observing that we need to find balance in our democracy and avoid a dictatorship of the elite imposing its views on the whole of society.

School board members will be held accountable for their decisions

Australian tyranny

Senator Paul formally requests DOJ investigation into Fauci

Civil rights (Peggy Hall, The Healthy American)

Notice of discrimination for requiring masks (The Healthy American)

Ohio complaint, sues governor


Giesecke: Lockdowns have no basis in science

Professor Johan Giesecke, one of the world’s most senior epidemiologists, advisor to the Swedish Government (he hired Anders Tegnell who is currently directing Swedish strategy), the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control explains that lock downs, social distancing and shutdown businesses to stop the spread of an infectious disease has no basis in science whatsoever.

Doctors Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi: Lockdowns not warranted

Two US doctors come forward to hold a press conference, to discuss that the current statistics and the science, in no way, warrant a shelter in place order.

Liz Wheeler: The Best Argument against Govt Mandated COVID-19 Lockdowns

April 2020 (she gives sources)

  • IF risk of transmission intra-family is high, and it is;
  • IF transmission via casual contact is low, and it is;
  • IF extreme social distancing reduces herd immunity, and it does;
  • IF the risk of elderly people contracting COVID is higher due to lockdowns, and it is;
  • IF the projection models were wrong, and they were;
  • IF hospitals are not overwhelmed, and they’re not;
  • IF the only hospitals that are closing are doing so because of lack of patients, and they are;
  • IF sunlight kills the virus, as it’s said to do;
  • IF the prevalence is higher than assumed, and hospitalization/death rates are lower, and they are; AND
  • IF we know people die FROM lockdowns, BECAUSE of lockdowns…

…how are the lockdowns justified or scientific?

Study Led by D.A. Henderson — The Man Who Eradicated Smallpox — Found Draconian Lockdowns for Flu Pandemics Ineffective and Even Destructive

By Jim Hoft, Published May 17, 2020

Leadership Means Reopening America Now

By Christian Whiton, April 10, 2020

‘There’s no direct evidence that the lockdowns are working’

Dr John A Lee, April 17, 2020

Epidemiologist Who Triggered Worldwide Lockdowns Admits: Without Instituting Full Lockdown, Sweden Essentially Getting Same Effect

By Hank Berrien, Jun 2, 2020

Quoting Neil Ferguson:

“They came to a different policy conclusion but based really on quite similar science.”

“Lockdown is a very crude policy and what we’d like to do is have a much more targeted approach that does not have the same economic impacts.”

Swedish expert: why lockdowns are the wrong policy

Freddie Sayers, with Professor Johan Giesecke, April 17, 2020

“Our policy is not driven by evidence.”

  • The correct policy is to protect the old and the frail only
  • Covid-19 is a “mild disease” and similar to the flu, and it was the novelty of the disease that scared people.
  • The actual fatality rate of Covid-19 is the region of 0.1%
  • The results will eventually be similar for all countries

The Left-Wing Case Against Lockdowns

Mr Alexis FitzGerald, 14 May 2020

Horowitz: We have been lied to: 6 facts that change everything we know about SARS-CoV-2

by Daniel Horowitz, THE BLAZE | Op-ed | May 18, 2020

Every day we learn new information demonstrating the lies driving lockdown.

  • States with longer lockdowns had worse results
  • Excess deaths are from the lockdowns, not the virus
  •  “[Social distancing] was widely mocked by the epidemiological community, including by Johns Hopkins, for ‘causing the potential for a serious adverse outcome,’[quoting Tucker below]” thereby ensuring that “a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.”

The 2006 Origins of the Lockdown Idea

Jeffrey A. Tucker | May 15, 2020

QUOTING the paper Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza:

  • There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for extended periods in order to slow the spread of influenza.
  • The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme…that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration…
  • Such a policy would also be particularly hard on and dangerous to people living in close quarters, where the risk of infection would be heightened….
  • Travel restrictions, such as closing airports and screening travelers at borders, have historically been ineffective.


Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted. Strong political and public health leadership to provide reassurance and to ensure that needed medical care services are provided are critical elements. If either is seen to be less than optimal, a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.

Lockdown Fallout

A new study by the WFP [World Food Programme] found that lockdowns and the economic recession caused by Covid-19 may exacerbate an already dire worldwide hunger crisis, almost doubling the number of people who could go hungry, pushing a total of 265 million people to the brink of starvation by the end of the year (double previous year).

According to WFP director David Beasley on April 21: “We could be looking at famine in about three dozen countries.”

If global GDP declines by 5%, another 147 million people could be plunged into extreme poverty, according to the International Food Policy Research Institute.

The lockdown is “possibly even more catastrophic (than the virus) in its outcome: the collapse of global food-supply systems and widespread human starvation” (italics added). That was published in the left-wing The Nation, which, nevertheless, enthusiastically supports lockdowns.

India COVID-19 lockdown means no food or work for rural poor

Millions in underdeveloped regions face penury and deprivation as economic activity grinds to a halt due to lockdown.

by Kunal Purohit, 2 Apr 2020

Virus lockdown risks 1.4 million TB deaths: Research

May 7, 2020

TB, a bacterial infection that normally attacks patients’ lungs, is largely treatable yet still infects an estimated 10 million people every year.

In 2018, it killed around 1.5 million people, according to the World Health Organization, including more than 200,000 children.

Since effective medication exists, the world’s TB response is centered on testing and treating as many patients as possible.

But as COVID-19 forces governments to place populations on lockdown, new disease models showed that social distancing could lead to a disastrous rebound in TB infection—the effects of which are set to persist for years.

A three-month lockdown followed by a 10-month ‘recovery’ period could lead to an additional six million infections and 1.4 million TB deaths by 2025, the study said.

Lockdown Protests

LONDON August 2020

BERLIN August 2020

…and many more since then we’ve not listed here!


Masks illogical

by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D.

Washington State Mask Mandate chart


Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

“The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non- medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death.

Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.”

CDC study on masks is misleading

CDC says masks work, but they didn’t include all the data AFTER cases started  going up!!

Original study is here.

Masks don’t work, and resources

Brain Damage from Masks

Mask and health documentary

Resource for data used in the above is here.

Masking — The Fact Are Clear (ebook)

Should healthy people wear masks?


Conclusion Regarding Masks: They Do Not Work (PDF)

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
Article with many sources of studies that show no benefit. See also this VIDEO.

Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures

Xiao, J et al. (2020), Emerg Infect Dis. 5 May 2020;26(5):967- 975.

“In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks” and “Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

“Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. We similarly found limited evidence on the effectiveness of improved hygiene and environmental cleaning.”

Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: a rapid systematic review.

Brainard JS, Jones N, et al. medRxiv 2020.04.01.20049528; 10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528

“The evidence is not sufficiently strong to support widespread use of facemasks as a protective measure against covid-19. However, there is enough evidence to support the use of facemasks for short periods of time by particularly vulnerable individuals when in transient higher risk situations.”

WHO said that medical masks should be reserved for health workers.

Most spread of the covid-19 virus is from known cases and requires contact with droplets from a cough or sneeze or infected surfaces. It said that “there is currently no evidence that wearing a mask (whether medical or other types) by healthy persons in the wider community setting, including universal community masking, can prevent them from infection with respiratory viruses, including covid-19.”

Cloth Masks are Useless against Covid 19

NIH: masks ineffective

“Neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered {COVID-19} during coughs by infected patients.” Conclusion: “both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.”

Note that it’s been retracted! But the reason for retraction doesn’t really make sense and doesn’t negate the conclusion

Surgeon general: Masks do not help

On March 2, after we had more confirmation that COVID-19 was indeed transmitted person to person, the surgeon general was pleading with the general public not to wear masks. As mentioned above, Dr. Adams said they don’t work and they actually can increase your risk. His exact words: “one of the things they shouldn’t be doing, the general public, is going out and buying masks. It actually does not help and it has not been proven to be effective at preventing the spread of Corona virus decreasing amongst the general public.” Listen to one of his interviews here.

Social distancing not based on science

German virus expert declares social distance isn’t based on science and that CV-19  can’t be found anywhere on any surface he tested.

Masks Don’t Work: A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy

Ben Swann, Truth in Media

Cases are rising, but deaths are not. It’s not deadly! Plus, 10 times the number of people actually had/have it, meaning the death rate is way less, plus people already have antibodies!

JAMA says don’t wear masks


A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers

C Raina MacIntyre et. al., April 22, 2015. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e006577.

“Penetration of viral particles through a cloth mask was almost 97%”

WHO says there is no need for healthy people to wear face masks, days after the CDC told all Americans to cover their faces

Julia Naftulin, Apr 7, 2020, 11:43 AM

“The argument … about everybody wearing a mask is not that it will prevent everyone from getting infected — it’s that it will slow down transmission in the community a bit,” Ben Cowling, a professor of epidemiology and a mask researcher at the University of Hong Kong’s School of Public Health, previously told Business Insider.

WHO guidance said…“there is currently no evidence that wearing a mask (whether medical or other types) by healthy persons in the wider community setting, including universal community masking, can prevent them from infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.”

Proof That Face Masks Do More Harm Than Good

Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA (2020?)

Masks are neither effective nor safe: A summary of the science

Colleen Huber, NMD, July 6, 2020

Healthy People Should Not Wear Face Masks

Jim Meehan, MD, July 4, 2020

How to avoid coronavirus on flights: Forget masks, says top airline doctor

Bloomberg News, Feb 6, 2020

Does wearing a mask while traveling ward off illness? Here’s what experts say

Dr. John Smith, Jan 24, 2020

Metagenomic Characterization of Airborne Viral DNA Diversity in the Near-Surface Atmosphere (or, Viruses are everywhere)

Tae Woong Whon, et. al, August 1, 2012

Why Cotton Masks Do Not Stop the Corona Virus

Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, May 17 2020

A scientific look at the mask fallacy – and why we’re told to wear them

Daniel Bobinski, July 15, 2020

Mandatory Mask Rights Flyer for Individuals and Businesses

by KrisAnne Hall, JD

Updated: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing

Patrick Wood, June 19, 2020

FAQ on masks


1-hr video explaining masks

Masks can INCREASE risk. Lots of sources.

Universal Masking in Hospitals in the COVID-19 Era: Widespread mask use not supported

Klompas, Michael., et al., NEJM 2020; 382:e63

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

Effects for Masked Employees

“People begin to suffer adverse health effects when the oxygen level of their breathing air drops below 19.5 percent oxygen. The rule-making record for the Respiratory Protection Standard clearly justifies adopting the requirement that air breathed by employees must have an oxygen content of at least 19.5 percent.”

Click for OSHA documents.


NY Times: Up To 90% Of People Who Test Positive For COVID-19 No Longer Contagious, ‘Don’t Need To Isolate’

August 30, 2020

Even a Military-Enforced Quarantine Can’t Stop the Virus, Study Reveals

Jeffrey A. Tucker – November 13, 2020

Censored: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy And Why Face Masks Don’t Work

Dennis Rancourt

The Absolute SCIENCE Behind MASKS And The PROOF THAT THEY DON’T WORK with Denis Rancourt (Press for Truth)

Video has been removed, but see this PDF.

Rancourt has reviewed MANY serious scientific studies about masks and written about his findings.


3:40 No difference between N95 mask and surgical masks

4:15 No detected advantage to wearing a mask

4:50 many respiratory diseases act the same way… this is really well-known stuff.

5:24 “It’s garbage science to say that you can’t look at all the studies we’ve done in the past because this is some new strain of coronavirus. That’s nonsense.”

5:50 “winter burden” deaths are always about the same, including this year. “There was nothing special happening.”

7:54 WHO admits worrisome disadvantages to wearing masks. Other orgs did not promote this early on for those reasons.

9:03 “It’s never been recommended before, and these [have always been] real potential dangers.”

9:40 Health care workers wearing N-95 had far more headaches than those without.

10:30 Masks to protect others from asymptomatic carriers? That’s a ridiculous notion; none of these studies have seen such an effect.

11:00 The smallest sized particles are responsible for transmissivity. They follow the flow of air, including out the sides of the mask. “It’s ridiculous that a cloth mask could have any effect.”

If a mask doesn’t protect you from inhaling, it’s not going to prevent those particles from getting out, either.

11:55 You don’t have to “plan” to get herd immunity; it’s going to happen.

12:47 these viruses have been with us forever; our immune system has been handling them all along.

13:05 Winter burden mortality is real; it basically affects those with comorbidity conditions.

14:15-16:40 death count spikes (for all-cause mortality) appear to align exactly with gov’t intervention! (source)

17:00 These sharp peaks are not natural… and they are synchronous around the world! Locking vulnerable people into a contained environment, combined with fear/stress/separating them from family… this is killing them.

19:00 Second wave: there’s ALWAYS a winter wave.

19:18 Mass draconian measures will only make things worse; no evidence that they make things better.

20:08 This phenomenon does not exist in equatorial countries because of their humidity. In those areas you’d be selling useless vaccines and harming people. This is a mid-latitude issue.

21:08 “This has been happening forever. This was not a killer pandemic. Nothing happened other than the craziness that humans did. That’s it.”

21:54 Recommends peaceful civil disobedience on the mask question. See this.

Referenced documents:



Nurse whistleblower on TREATMENT

Nurse speaks out about respiratory illness and how they are doing it totally different  and wrong for Covid.

The Zelenko Protocol, a low-cost (usually $20) prescription 


The Key to Defeating COVID-19 Already Exists. We Need to Start Using It (Opinion)

Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD , Professor of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, July 23, 2020


What does a positive covid test mean?

Kary Mullis, on the PCR test that HE designed

Misuse of PCR test lawsuit

Amazing logical video describing PCR Tests (Dr. Sam Bailey)

She has LOTS of other good ones on her channel!

Human chromosome 8?

Covid tests for chromosome in humans.

Florida: 100% test positive

Tests in Florida reported 100% tested positive! Then said, “oops, it’s only 9.4%!”


Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it

“Four German holiday makers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

Faults in test system (Spiro Skouras interviews Dr. Kaufman)

Dr. Andrew Kaufman clearly explains the faults in the testing system and explain why there is no virus whatsoever.

Tests are scientifically meaningless

From that paper:

“We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist. In 2001, Science published an “impassioned plea…to the younger generation” from   several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that:

“[Modern virus detection methods like] sleek polymerase chain reaction […] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.”

Labcorp’s COVID-10 RT-PCR Test EUA Summary (May 11, 2021): Results inconclusive

“Positive results […] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”

CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019- nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

“This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

Positive test could be result of antibodies

From the CDC:

“A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.”

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, Jun 27, 2020


Proof from their own “science” that sars-cov-2 is NOT infectious and it’s harmless!

“Using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2—even in high amounts—were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested.”




Asymptomatic spread is FAKE

Coronavirus: Only isolated cases of transmission by patients without symptoms, says Gan Kim Yong

Joyce Teo, Senior Health Correspondent, Feb 4, 2020

Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks

Leung, Nancy., et al. (2020) Nature Medicine 26, 676-680.

Healthy persons do not spread illness.

“Among the samples collected without a face mask, we found that the majority of participants with influenza virus and coronavirus infection did not shed detectable virus in respiratory droplets or aerosols… given that each exhaled breath collection was conducted for 30 min, this might imply that prolonged close contact would be required for transmission to occur, even if transmission was primarily via aerosols.”

A Study of infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 carriers

Gao, Ming. et al. Respiratory Medicine. 2020. Aug: 169:106026

455 contacts who were exposed to the asymptomatic COVID-19 virus carrier: 35 patients, 196 family members and 224 hospital staffs. NONE of the 455 contacts contracted the SARS-CoV-2 infection.

How CNN Deceives about Asymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

by Jeremy R. Hammond, Jun 26, 2020

VIDEO: Is Asymptomatic Transmission Fake News?

Volume 1 – 10 Feb 2021

Transmission routes of respiratory viruses among humans

Jasmin S Kutter et. al,Feb. 2018

‘Just breathing’ is enough to spread flu

Catharine Paddock, Ph.D., January 22, 2018


Fauci: “An epidemic is NOT driven by asymptomatic carriers.




What is in the mRNA vaccine?


Information On Pfizer Vaccine – First Batch of Documents Shows Over 1,200 Vaccine Deaths WITHIN FIRST 90 DAYS


2011 newspaper article about Bill Gates’ solution to over-population through forced vaccination


“The Smoking Syringe — was evidence withheld from ACIP when they recommended the Pfizer Vaccine?”

Long article that shows lower effectiveness, more dangers, etc.

Video of 10 effects of the Vax

“Unsafe for humans”

The UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency says they “now have more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans”!!!

Video about vaccines, adverse effects, not effective, faulty numbers, etc.

Video with narration and graphics about vaccine, testing, etc.


Genetic therapy vaccine


Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trial Shows Alarming Evidence of Pathogenic Priming in Older Adults

Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—we need more details and the raw data

January 4, 2021

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease

Timothy Cardozo, Ronald Veazey, 28 October 2020

Results of the study:

“COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.”

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications:

“The specific and significant COVID‐19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.”

New survey of vaccine-free group exposes long-term impact of vaccination policies on public health

Greg Glaser and Pat O’Connell

We don’t know if it’s safe or effective, if the risks outweigh the disease, or if the risks or rare or not. Key points from this article:

  1. In a Supreme Court case, Justice Scalia said, “Indeed, the FDA has never even spelled out in regulations the criteria it uses to decide whether a vaccine is safe and effective for its intended use.”
  2. Emergency vaccines (like those for covid-19) are not being properly tested in animals before being approved for Phase 1 human trials. Animal trials are crucial to determine how vaccinated subjects react later, when they are exposed to the wild virus, to ensure they don’t create pathogenic priming, which can trigger a dangerous, sometimes deadly, immune overreaction called a “cytokine storm.” (Source here.)
  3. Vaccines are not safety tested against harmless (inert) placebos like saline. They’re tested against false “placebos” consisting of other unavoidably unsafe vaccines already on the market or the most toxic ingredients in the new vaccine. That’s why we never know how vaccines stack up against Nature, or random chance. Similarly, vaccine clinical trials never use fully unvaccinated control subjects. This is like a tobacco company claiming cigarettes are safe because they compared people who smoke 70 cigarettes per week to those who smoke 69 cigarettes per week.
  4. The authorities have never systematically and broadly compared the long-term health of the vaccine-free who have caught these infections versus the health of those who have been vaccinated for the diseases.
  5. The national Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) captures fewer than 1% of all vaccine reactions and deaths according to the government’s own study by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care. In other words, the system misses more than 99% of harms caused by vaccines. That means any statistics showing the number of adverse reactions must be multiplied by 100 for a reasonably accurate estimate.

New definition of “vaccine”

Important video showing that they CHANGED the definition of “vaccine” in January 2021, and also the Who admitting they don’t know if or how the “vaccine” will protect you or not. Basically it’s an experimental trial.

Germany and Canada halt the use of one of the Covid-19 vaccines due to adverse effects

What Vaccine Trials?

Covid vaccine dangers


Covid vaccine is not a vaccine, it’s genetic engineering that will cause auto-immune disorders


It’s Gene Therapy (Dr. David Martin)

“Vaccine” is NOT a Vaccine, IS Genetic Engineering

Key points from this article/video:

  1. The mRNA pharmaceuticals are, in fact, not vaccines since they do not present the body with antigens, stimulating an antibody (protein) response
  2. They are untested genetic alteration devices which capture the body’s immune capacity forcing a response to the inserted material which forever changes the cell
  3. Once inserted, vast numbers of people will face the unknown effects of these untested devices
  4. There is no known way to neutralize, cancel, remove or correct the effects of these untested devices
  5. Fatalities and other serious adverse events are already occurring around the world following the injection of these untested devices
  6. Every country in the world except Brazil has given the makers of these devices full financial and legal indemnity from any liability of any kind, no matter what damage is caused by these untested devices

Covid Vaccine Secret (Jon Rappoport)

“…the WHO protocols Pfizer used to produce the mRNA [for the vaccine] do not appear to identify any nucleotide sequences that are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When investigator Fran Leader questioned Pfizer they confirmed: ‘The DNA template does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person’.” (Quote is from here.)

Effective? Not so fast…relative versus absolute risk


Phase 3 Trials end May 2, 2023

Dr. Scott Atlas: Not for children

“I am absolutely pro-vaccine. But to me, it’s unconscionable that a society uses its children as shields for adults. Children do not have a significant risk from this illness… Are we [as] a society, a civilization … going to inject our children with an experimental drug that they don’t have a significant benefit from, to shield ourselves?”
—Dr. Scott Atlas

Funeral Director Blows the whistle: “Delta Variant” is Vaccine injury

MAX IGAN with John O’Looney (VIDEO) , Sep 16, 2021. (Also on Bitchute, if the other is taken down.)

VAERS query, 8/2/2021


VAERS DATA as of 8/27/21

COVID 19 vaccine adverse reactions compiled from CDC VAERS data:

  • Deaths 13,911
  • Permanently Disabled 18,098
  • Hospitalizations 56,912
  • Life-threatening 14,328
  • Severe allergic reaction 26,655 Heart attacks 6,217
  • Myocarditis/Pericarditis 5,222
  • Shingles 7,578
  • Bell’s Palsy 4,832
  • Anaphylaxis 5,752
  • Office visits 103,837
  • Urgent care 76,159
  • Miscarriages 1,709

Iceland Stats

Dr. Simone Gold – The truth about the CV19 vaccine

Jan 14, 2021

More Covid Vaccine Deaths than Covid Deaths Over the Last Two Weeks

July 18, 2021

NOTE this “fact check” of a story similar to the above. Fascinating how they don’t actually tell us the numbers reported by CDC or VAERS during that two-week period, to simply prove that the claim was wrong…

RFK Jr. overview (5min), mostly re: pathogenic priming

AFD suing HHS

(see the PDF)

Doctors Around the World Issue Dire Warning: Do Not Get the COVID Vaccine!

(This link has the above PLUS a few others.)

COVID-19 Vax effects—Sherry Tenpenny

Professor Dolores Cahill interview in London, England, 22nd September 2020


VERIFY: Moderna, Pfizer vaccines may prevent disease, but not infection

Matt Gregory, Nov 19, 2020
“Simply put, we don’t know if these vaccines prevent infection, but we do know their primary job is to stop the virus from becoming a disease or lessen the disease.”

WHO Episode #23 I am vaccinated, what next?

mRNA: Pathogenic Priming

SM-102 Safety Data Sheet


What Vaccine Trials? The most important, meaningful phase of CV-19 vaccine trials has barely begun, let alone been completed

Iain Davis, Jan 3, 2021

The Vaccine Divide and Emerging Segregation Society

Jesse Smith, June 1, 2021

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines

Joseph Mercola, February 11, 2021


Effective or Inconclusive?


Profiting from COVID: How Vaccine Makers Caused the Opioid Crisis

Russell Brand, March 7, 2021

Affidavit of Ltc. Theresa Long M.D. in support of a motion for a preliminary injunction order

The heart of her message:

39. The subject matter of this Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and its devastating effects on members of the military compel me to conclude and conduct accordingly as follows:

a)  None of the ordered Emergency Use Covid 19 vaccines can or will provide better immunity than an infection-recovered person;

b)  All three of the EUA Covid 19 vaccines (Comirnaty is not available), in the age group and fitness level of my patients, are more risky, harmful and dangerous than having no vaccine at all, whether a person is Covid recovered or facing a Covid 19 infection;

c)  Direct evidence exists and suggests that all persons who have received a Covid 19 Vaccine are damaged in their cardiovascular system in an irreparable and irrevocable manner;

d)  Due to the Spike protein production that is engineered into the user’s genome, each such recipient of the Covid 19 Vaccines already has micro clots in their cardiovascular system that present a danger to their health and safety;

e)  That such micro clots over time will become bigger clots by the very nature of the shape and composition of the Spike proteins being produced and said proteins are found throughout the user’s body, including the brain;

f)  That at the initial stage this damage can only be discovered by a biopsy or Magnetic Resonance Image (“MRI”) scan;

g)  That due to the fact that there is no functional myocardial screening currently being conducted, it is my professional opinion that substantial foreseen risks currently exist, which require proper screening of all flight crews.

h)  That, by virtue of their occupations, said flight crews present extraordinary risks to themselves and others given the equipment they operate, munitions carried thereon and areas of operation in close proximity to populated areas.

i)  That, without any current screening procedures in place, including any Aero Message (flight surgeon notice) relating to this demonstrable and identifiable risk, I must and will therefore ground all active flight personnel who received the vaccinations until such time as the causation of these serious systemic health risks can be more fully and adequately assessed.

j)  That, based on the DOD’s own protocols and studies, the only two valuable methodologies to adequately assess this risk are through MRI imaging or cardio biopsy which must be performed.

k)  That, in accordance with the foregoing, I hereby recommend to the Secretary of Defense that all pilots, crew and flight personnel in the military service who required hospitalization from injection or received any Covid 19 vaccination be grounded similarly for further dispositive assessment.

l) That this Court should grant an immediate injunction to stop the further harm to all military personnel to protect the health and safety of our active duty, reservists and National Guard troops.

The Covid Vaccine on Trial [Video]

starting 55:40

  1. “Does the COVID-19 injection provide antibody immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, making it an effective vaccine?” The answer is no. Even the manufacturers say that we may not develop immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus with this injection.
  2. “Does the COVID-19 injection provide us protection from getting a SARS-CoV-2 viral infection?” The answer is no. The manufacturers and the experts have already said that this may reduce the symptoms if you get the infection, but it will not protect you from getting the SARS-CoV-2 viral infection.
  3. “Has the COVID-19 injection been shown to reduce the number of deaths from a SARS-CoV-2 infection?” The answer is no. Not only that, but the manufacturers did not test whether this COVID-19 injection would reduce the number of deaths from a SARS- CoV-2 infection.
  4. “Has the COVID-19 injection been shown to reduce the circulation of the SARS- CoV-2 virus in the population?” The answer is no.
  5. “Has the COVID-19 injection been shown to reduce the transmission or spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from one person to the next?” The answer is no. The manufacturers and the scientific experts have said that, “We did not test this injection to see if it would stop the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from one person to the next.”

Since none of these criteria, not one of the five criteria have been met that define what is a vaccine, we cannot call this a vaccine. So anyone who’s thinking, anyone who’s literally using their brain cells to critically think, must wonder if this does not behave as a vaccine, what is it and how does it behave in the body, knowing full well that it takes a good seven, 10, maybe even 15 years to answer these five questions that I just raised.

Dr. Cowan 1:11:00

“I was asked to give a brief presentation on the issue of whether SARS-CoV-2 virus is the cause of an illness called COVID-19. Leaving aside for now the question of what exactly is COVID-19, the central question is, “How does any scientist, any virologist prove that a “new virus” is the cause of any illness?” The answer is surprisingly clear and straightforward. It also mimics how any normal human being proves the causation of anything.

  1. The first thing one does is to find a number of people who seem to suffer from the illness in question, this could be COVID-19, AIDS, Hep C, or any other illness.
  2. Then, using standard and common virological isolation and purification techniques, techniques that have been in common use in every virology lab for decades, one would isolate the virus from every other substance in the blood, sputum, or tissues of the affected person or animal.
  3. Using electron microscopy one then shows the world the pure, isolated particles called viruses from each of these people, all of the viruses should look identical.
  4. The next step would be to analyze the genetic material of these identical particles using commonly available, computerized genetic sequencing tools, which have also been available for decades. These sequences should also be identical from one particle to the next.
  5. Finally, these isolated, purified, photographed, and sequenced viruses would then be introduced on to test animals along with rigorous and appropriate controls to see whether the test animals develop the identical illness that the original subjects had.

Then and only then, once these steps have been performed can we say with confidence that this new virus is the likely cause of this new illness.

During this past year, I have spent countless hours looking for evidence that these simple steps were done for the illness called COVID-19, and that the virus called SARS- CoV-2 was properly isolated and characterized. To my shock and surprise, neither I nor anyone else I know looking into this issue has yet to find a single published study that even attempted to perform these simple and doable experiments.

To my further shock and surprise, I found that not only were these experiments not done with SARS-CoV-2, but they were also not done with AIDS, Hep C, measles, or any other illness supposedly caused by pathogenic viruses. As shocking as this may be to hear, I now ask that if you dispute this, please make available the paper or papers that successfully did these simple experiments.

The usual excuses for this utter failure to perform the proper scientific experiments are such statements as,

“Well, there’s not enough virus material to see in the sputum of sick people,” or, “Viruses are intracellular organisms and therefore can’t be found in this manner outside the cell.”

My response is, “If there aren’t enough viruses can’t be found from the tissues or secretions of sick people using an electron microscope, then how can these same unfindable viruses have the potential to kill us all?

And if the viruses can’t be found outside the cell, so therefore don’t exist outside the cell, then how on earth does it spread from person to person?”

Finally, it is incorrect to say that this procedure I outlined above is just one way to isolate and characterize viruses. The reality is, it’s the only way. Clearly logic and common sense dictate that if you have not isolated the thing you are looking for, there is no possible way to determine what the thing is made of or what it alone does.

The implications of what I am saying are enormous. If there is no proof of pathogenic viruses then, “What the heck is making people sick? What is causing what people are calling COVID symptoms? Why do some diseases seem to spread between people but never consistently?” And most important, “Why are we locking down the whole world and risking losing an entire generation of children based on the fear of an imaginary virus?” Unfortunately, I’m out of time now to address these questions, but I have made many videos that are posted on my BitChute and YouTube channels that do address these very questions, so please check them out. And please understand, I do not claim to have all the answers to these important questions of how and why we get sick, but one thing I do know for sure is that there is no solid, scientific proof behind the theory of pathogenic viruses. And if we don’t start asking these questions, things are only going to get worse and worse.

Finally, I want to remind us all that there is no bad guy out there making us mask or isolate our children. There is no bad guy locking us in our homes. There is no bad guy injecting poisons into ourselves and our children. There is no bad guy ruining the businesses that we worked for generations to build. We are doing these things to ourselves, this means we have the power, the agency to stop these practices right now. All it takes is courage, courage. Join me, we can do this. Thanks for listening.

Around 10:30 of the following video, he explains you’re way more likely to get sick from  the vaccine than from the actual disease!

80% of people had 1 or more clinical presentations of covid 19

80% of people who had a positive PCR test had no symptoms at all!

They say it’s effective not because it blocks illness but because it lessened or shortened symptoms. However, the vaccinated group still had symptoms! They just classified them as adverse reactions and not covid. But the symptoms are the same!



The Dangers of Blockchain-Enabled ‘Immunity Passports’ for COVID-19

Elizabeth M. Renieris, May 18, 2020

Elizabeth M. Renieris, a Harvard lawyer on the ID2020 technical advisory committee, resigned from the ID2020 Alliance over concerns that the organization would get involved in COVID-19 immunity passports. In this article, she wrote:

“The prospect of severely curtailing the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals through ill-thought-out plans for ‘immunity passports’ or similar certificates, particularly ones that would leverage premature standards and a highly experimental and potentially rights-infringing technology like blockchain, is beyond dystopian.”


How Virologists disprove themselves in 7 steps


Truth About Viruses – Dr. Sam Bailey


Stefan Lanka — The Virus Misconception Part 1

Stefan Lanka — The Virus Misconception Part 2


Statement on virus isolation – IMPORTANT


The Computer-Generated Frankenstein Virus: CDC Scientists Admit Only Using 37 Base Pairs From Real Tissue To Assemble SARS-CoV-2

SARS-CoV-2 is a stitched-together, Frankenstein virus, because it is a computer-generated, digital, abstract creation, not a real living virus. It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a computer viral database.

The CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs! That means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue.

Covid V exposed: whistleblower saying it’s full of s*#&

Stew Peters show—Covid NOT ISOLATED


Christine Massey from the FOIA requests


Dr. Stefano Scoglio—sars-cov 2 NOT isolated

No isolation of COVID-19

Every institution has failed to provide even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of any “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).

Sars-cov-2 NOT isolated, or any other virus!

Dr Kaufman and Dr Cowan

What is a virus? (Video):

So what is a virus, and how can a virus be seen? Addressing the pink elephant in the room pertaining to scientific practice, electron microscopy, histology, and the misinterpretations within modern biology in general.

Open Letter to Dr. Mercola regarding the existence and isolation of sars-cov2

This is an open letter to Dr. Mercola from Christine Massey of She is writing in response to his blog post which strangely isn’t on his site, but can be found here: . Dr. Mercola states that the virus does exist, it’s been isolated, and the genome has been sequenced. However, Christine Massey raises very important points and questions. 

Dr Kaufman explaining no evidence for new virus


Challenge to Public Health England: Prove that COVID-19 virus exists

Challenge to Public Health England that they must show proof that a virus exists which causes covid19 or declare there is no virus and end the vax and trax programs.

A common virus (Medicinenet)

“Coronavirus: a type of common virus that infects humans, typically leading to an upper respiratory infection (URI.) Seven different types of human coronavirus have been identified. Most people will be infected with at least one type of coronavirus in their lifetime.”

Why coronavirus is not contagious


Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells Grew the Virus

Lung specialist Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg

31-minute video:

The seasonal flu is always the result of multiple pathogens. Coronavirus is always pat of this mix. Of course flu is dangerous, and even lethal, but it is not higher this year than any other year. It does not help to focusing on one particular virus; they are all factors in the seasonal flu.

Proportion of flu to coronavirus is 20:1. What we are observing is the number of tests. Of course, coronaviruses are present at a rate of 5-15%. Of course the more we test, the more cases we show, corresponding to that known rate. We have never called out this subcategory in the past.

4/12/2020 Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, PhD (MIT), Scientist & Biological Engineer

Original link was DELETED but here is his channel.
Big Pharma, Big Ag (dirty water/air/food) are not the solution. Vitamins A & D, lower inflammation, good nutrition, and strong immune health will take care of viruses like these (we carry billions/trillions on and in us).

Professor Knut Wittkowski (Epidemiologist for 35 years)

Find the 4/10/2020 video here, but it may get taken down again so here are notes.

  • “I don’t work for the government, so I can just do science.”
  • 1:54 “The only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity. About 80% of people need to have had contact with the virus, and a majority of them won’t even recognize that they were infected, or they have very, very mild symptoms, especially children.
    It’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus and get herd immunity as fast as possible. And then the elderly people which are separated with nursing homes closed during that time can come back and be with their children and grandchildren after the virus has been exterminated.”
  • “Flatten the curve” widens and prolongs it; if you leave it alone, it’s gone in 4 weeks.
  • The Pandemic is over in China and S Korea. New cases in Europe are declining. US is a bit further behind but it is leveling off.
  • “If there had been no intervention, the epidemic would have been over [by now]. Like every other respiratory disease epidemic.”
  • Funding for hospitals has not increased recently. They had to cut down, so they now have to run their emergency plans. That’s not the end of the world.
  • “This is not a situation nobody has ever thought about.” (sarcastically)
  • “There are no indications that this flu is fundamentally different from every other flu. We know what happened in China, S. Korea, Europe. Maybe just a bit worse than other flus.
  • Going outdoors, where the virus cannot easily spread, is a form of containment. This is what stops every respiratory disease.
  • You cannot stop a respiratory disease from spreading. Social distancing may slow it down, but it will still happen until herd immunity is reached.
  • For some reason humankind has survived all sorts of respiratory diseases.
  • You can download the date from the European CDC every day and analyze it. That’s what I have done.
  • This has behaved exactly as other flu.
  • Date of diagnosis and date of reporting are not separated as we did with HIV/AIDS reporting.
  • The course of an epidemic is always smooth; there is never a tenfold increase from one day to another. A leap is a case of someone finding unreported cases and reporting them all at once, for example.
  • Q: Why are we so panicked this time? A: The internet. Sensational (likely inaccurate) headlines.
  • Health risks of shelter in place: There MAY be fewer cases overall, but we may see MORE deaths among the elderly, because we’ve prevented the school children from creating herd immunity.
  • Second wave: If we had herd immunity now, there would not be a second wave in the fall. Now, it is nearly guaranteed, as soon as we stop social distancing or temperatures cool.
  • Outside of China, we started social distancing too soon (i.e., before we could create herd immunity).
  • Depression is real.
  • Should we resist house arrest? YES, or at least hold our politicians responsible. We should open schools, and let the children spread the virus among themselves. This was the most destructive action by the governments. We should separately only the elderly/most vulnerable.
  • Not-well-thought-through policy is hurting us.
  • Q: Should we be tested to come out of isolation? A: NO. Antibody testing will helps us see how close we are to herd immunity. But testing for people who are infections, they may have already been for several days. Testing for a respiratory disease is neither respiratory or effective.
  • Q: With your age and diabetic condition, are you afraid of the virus? A: NO. We DON’T DIE OF THE VIRUS. We die of pneumonia, which is treated with antibiotics.

Some Helpful Tips

Top 10 (or more) answers when friends or family ask “Why aren’t you getting jabbed?!”

  1. My body my choice
  2. Trials aren’t over until 2023
  3. Adverse reactions times 100
  4. Pfizer known to be fraudulent ($2.4billion settlement)
  5. All the animals died in the animal trials
  6. V doesn’t stop you from getting it or passing it around. It doesn’t reduce spread according their own “science?”
  7. Natural immunity stronger than V (Israel study)
  8. If V works, why do you care if I’m not V?
  9. Flu shot every year? Did they give you a hard time about that?
  10. Possible brain damage admitted. Don’t know long-term effects yet, obviously. See link 1 and link 2; the actual paper is here.
  11. Many medical professionals aren’t getting the shot.

Four Key Reasons Why People Choose to Not Wear a Mask

1. Masks offer no protection to the wearer

a. Masks are not an effective way of protection from the new coronavirus, only N95 are, and masks have disclaimers saying they cannot prevent someone from acquiring the new coronavirus

2. Evidence is lacking that masks protect anyone: the wearer or the public

b. See the references above

3. Masks increase the risk of contracting an infection: COVID19 or others

a. Masks can become contaminated very quickly, and every time the wearer breathes in, they inhale contaminants

4. Masks might harm the wearer

a. Masks limit oxygen intake and increase carbon dioxide (CO2)

b. Masks are dangerous for people with certain health conditions (COPD, asthma), as they may restrict breathing

i. The WHO acknowledge that people living with asthma, chronic respiratory conditions, or breathing problems may experience difficulties when wearing face masks.

ii. The CDC recommend that anyone who has trouble breathing should not wear a face covering.